COMPARISON OF ANALYTIC AND SYNTHETIC METHODS
ANALYTIC METHOD | SYNTHETIC METHOD |
Meaning: Analysis means breaking up into components | Meaning: Synthesis means combining the elements to get something new. |
Leads from: v Unknown to known v Conclusion to hypothesis v Abstract to concrete v Complex to simple | Leads from: v Known to unknown v Hypothesis to conclusion v Concrete to abstract v Simple to complex |
Method: v A method of discovery and thought v A psychological method | Method: v A method for the presentation of discovered facts. v A logical method |
Time: Lengthy, laborious and time consuming | Time: Short, concise and elegant. |
Sequence: Valid reasons to justify every step in the sequence. | Sequence: No justification for every step in the sequence. |
Learning: Encourages meaningful learning. | Learning: Encourages rote learning |
Easy to rediscover | Once forgotten not easy to recall |
Encourages: Encourages originality of thinking and reasoning | Encourages: Encourages memory work |
Learning: Informal and disorganized | Learning: Formal, systematic ad orderly |
Thinking: Process of thinking | Thinking: Product of thinking |
Participation: Active participation of the learner | Participation: Learner is a passive listener |
Though both analytic and synthetic method seems to oppose each other, they complement and support each other. Analysis leads to synthesis and synthesis makes the purpose of analysis clear and complete. The teacher while teaching can use analytic methods and can encourage the student to present them in the synthetic method. Ie. Analysis forms the beginning and synthesis follow up work.
I like this work.
ReplyDeleteThank you for this work
ReplyDelete.. It was awesome 😊
Leads from unknown to known is difficult to understand....
ReplyDeletevery helpful to me....
ReplyDelete